coin project
Ancient Coin Collectors Guild
Please support our sponsors


Log In | Register
[83524 Coins (44231 Unverified)]
 
 
Search
Advanced Search
Search By Coin ID
 
 
Home
ANCIENT/BYZANTINE
Ancient Africa (157)
Ancient East (4671)
Ancient Spain (872)
Byzantine (753)
Celtic (372)
Goths, Vandals (259)
Greek (22306)
Roman Imperial (32425)
Roman Provincial (8276)
Roman Republican & Imperatorial (2318)
MEDIEVAL/EARLY WORLD
Ancient and Medieval India (71)
Ancient and Medieval Far East (10245)
Central Europe and Italy (20)
Eastern Europe and Scandinavia (54)
Germany (30)
Islamic (18)
Western Europe (102)
MODERN WORLD
Africa (5)
Asia (0)
Australia and the Pacific Islands (0)
Europe (17)
North America (0)
South America (0)
COUNTERFEITS AND IMITATIONS
Ancient Imitations (444)
Modern Forgeries of Ancient Coins (19)
Medieval Imitations (0)
Modern Forgeries of Medieval Coins (0)
Modern Forgeries of Modern Coins (0)
 
Submit New Coin(s)
 
Sponsors page
Terms of Service
Contact Us
About Us
FAQ Page
Coin Detail
Click here to see enlarged image.
ID:     324
Type:     Goths, Vandals
Region:     VANDALS
City:     Pseudo-Imperial Imitations
Issuer:     Honorius
Date Ruled:     AD 393-423
Metal:     Silver
Denomination:     Siliqua
Struck / Cast:     struck
Date Struck:     AD c.440-c.490
Diameter:     15.5 mm
Weight:     1.3 g
Die Axis:     6 h
Obverse Legend:     D N HONORIVS P F AVG
Obverse Description:     Honorius diademed, draped, and cuirassed bust right
Reverse Legend:     VRBS ROIIA
Reverse Description:     Roma seated left on cuirass holding victory on globe and reversed spear, in ex rvps (ravenna)
Mint Mark:     RVPS
Mint:     Carthage
Primary Reference:     RIC -
Reference2:     MEC 1, 1-3
Reference3:     BMC Vand. 2 n.6-9
Reference4:     Morrison and Schwartz ANSMN 27 pl.25, var. n.29
Photograph Credit:     FORUM ANCIENT COINS
Source:     http://www.forumancientcoins.com/catalog/roman-and-greek-coins.asp?zpg=2807
Special Comments:     Probably issued by Gaiseric.
Notes:     Issuer is difficult to determine certainly as there seems to be no conclusive evidence that this type can properly be ascribed to Gaiseric only since this issue may have been struck up to the beginning of regal coinage by Gunthamund, thereby given issuance by Gaiseric, Hunneric and also possibly at the beginning of Gunthamund's reign.