coin project
Please support our sponsors


Log In | Register
[83524 Coins (44231 Unverified)]
 
 
Search
Advanced Search
Search By Coin ID
 
 
Home
ANCIENT/BYZANTINE
Ancient Africa (157)
Ancient East (4671)
Ancient Spain (872)
Byzantine (753)
Celtic (372)
Goths, Vandals (259)
Greek (22306)
Roman Imperial (32425)
Roman Provincial (8276)
Roman Republican & Imperatorial (2318)
MEDIEVAL/EARLY WORLD
Ancient and Medieval India (71)
Ancient and Medieval Far East (10245)
Central Europe and Italy (20)
Eastern Europe and Scandinavia (54)
Germany (30)
Islamic (18)
Western Europe (102)
MODERN WORLD
Africa (5)
Asia (0)
Australia and the Pacific Islands (0)
Europe (17)
North America (0)
South America (0)
COUNTERFEITS AND IMITATIONS
Ancient Imitations (444)
Modern Forgeries of Ancient Coins (19)
Medieval Imitations (0)
Modern Forgeries of Medieval Coins (0)
Modern Forgeries of Modern Coins (0)
 
Submit New Coin(s)
 
Sponsors page
Terms of Service
Contact Us
About Us
FAQ Page
Coin Detail
Click here to see enlarged image.
ID:     1633
Type:     Roman Imperial
Issuer:     Martinian
Date Ruled:     AD 324
Metal:     Bronze
Denomination:     AE 3
Struck / Cast:     struck
Date Struck:     AD 324
Diameter:     20.5 mm
Weight:     2.98 g
Obverse Legend:     IM CS MAR MARTINIANVĪ“ P F AVS
Obverse Description:     Radiate, draped and cuirassed bust right
Reverse Legend:     IOVI CONS_ERVATORI
Reverse Description:     Jupiter standing left with chlamys across left shoulder, Victory on globe in right hand, left hand leaning on eagle-tipped scepter; eagle with wreath in beak to left on ground; to right captive seated on ground.
Exergue:     SMKA
Mint Mark:     SMKA/ X/II episemon in right field
Mint:     Cyzicus
Primary Reference:     RIC VII 016
Reference2:     SRCV 3824v (obverse inscription)
Reference3:     VM 001v (obverse inscription)
Reference4:     Vagi 3037
Photograph Credit:     FORUM ANCIENT COINS
Source:     http://www.forumancientcoins.com/catalog/roman-and-greek-coins.asp?zpg=3141
Notes:     Note the blundered obverse legend, which in fact may be the norm. This "alteration" was not noted in RIC despite the obvious example on Plate 22.